Prevention is better than cure

Proceeds from taxes on stimulants should go more towards prevention and the promotion of healthy lifestyles. This would help to reduce the epidemic of diseases of civilisation.

Publikacja: 08.09.2023 02:53

Prevention is better than cure

Foto: Wojciech Kordowski

According to the National Transformation Programme — the health programme for 2022–2027 — the focus should not so much be on treatment as such, but primarily on prevention.

This also applies to the fight against modern-age diseases, such as obesity and related metabolic diseases or alcohol and tobacco addiction. What policies, what programmes should health care policy take into account to improve the infamous rise in the incidence of modern-age diseases — these were the topics discussed by experts during the panel discussion, “State versus pragmatic health economics”.

Will Poles heal themselves?

– “First of all, it is important to point out that the health system in Poland is too much oriented towards the so-called “recovery base”, said Dr. Krzysztof Łanda, physician, entrepreneur, Deputy Minister of Health between 2015 and 2017. – “We have an extensive hospital base, a specialist base, to treat diseases. And it is well known that prevention is better than cure. Meanwhile, we spend very little on prevention and health promotion in Poland”, he noted.

In his opinion, there is a lack of well-structured prevention programmes, which would be implemented with strict rigour. And it looks a bit as if the state has put health education in the hands of... the Internet because that is where Poles most often look for advice on how to live healthily. According to Dr. Łanda, possible arguments that there is not enough money for such programmes are more of an excuse. The revenue from public levies imposed on stimulants is very large, and it is a wonder why the state does not use it to its full potential.

More prevention

– “The most cost-effective, i.e., the most cost-efficient health care programmes are early interventions, such as vaccination and primary prevention”, Marcin Czech, Deputy Minister of Health for 2017–2019, a specialist in epidemiology and public health, added in the interview with “Rzeczpospolita” daily.

– “Hence, expanding the vaccination schedule and thinking about it not only from the perspective of the paediatric population, i.e., children, but also from the perspective of adult vaccination seems a very sensible investment and a good decision. This early intervention means that people do not get sick, do not get infected, do not get complications, do not turn up at GPs, do not receive specialist treatment, and therefore do not involve the most expensive health care resource, which is hospital treatment”, explained M. Czech.

Budget hole

– “The basis of modern health economics is the economic analysis of the law”, stressed Prof. Robert Gwiazdowski, lecturer at Łazarski University and tax expert at the Adam Smith Centre. – “There is a superstition that economists deal with oil, prices, or GDP. But equally important is the economic analysis of the law, e.g., in terms of tax legislation. This also applies to the health market, which is heavily regulated”, noted Prof. Gwiazdowski.

As he recalled, Poles pay health insurance premiums, so-called NFZ contributions. Products that are harmful to health are also heavily taxed — these include tobacco products and alcohol (excise duty), but also sugar (so-called sugar tax). The question is whether the proceeds of these public levies are well used and the system well structured?

Experts have many doubts about it. Revenues from excise duty or sugar tax go into the state budget, or as participants in the debate said, “fall into a big black hole”. As so-called undesignated money, it is not earmarked for specific needs, e.g., treatment of lung cancer or other tobacco-related lung diseases, or diseases resulting from alcohol abuse. Nor are they used for appropriate prevention programmes.

Taxes and health

One can also have reservations about the design of the tax system. – “We are not learning from countries that are successfully implementing health-oriented policies, such as Sweden or the UK. Sweden has recently announced that it has become a tobacco-free country as the percentage of “smokers” has fallen to just 5; it is the first EU country with such a huge success”, said Krzysztof Łanda.

According to Dr. Łanda, the basis for this success was... the excise policy adequate to the so-called pyramid of harmfulness. This means that the most harmful traditional cigarettes (due to the many poisonous substances that enter the body when tobacco is burnt) are subject to the highest excise duty, innovative tobacco products (e.g., e-cigarettes) — to a slightly lower tax, and products that do not contain tobacco (e.g., nicotine pouches) or do not cause tobacco-related diseases — to the lowest.

– “This pyramid of harmfulness is supported by scientific research. I hope that in Poland, too, we will start adopting such a pragmatic approach based on scientific evidence. For now, however, we have a rather dogmatic approach – either ban everything, that is absurd, or stick with what we have”, commented Dr. Łanda.

Discouraging or encouraging?

Professor Gwiazdowski agreed that banning smoking or alcohol, for example, was a direct path to the emergence of a black market as in the days of prohibition in the USA. It can also be counterproductive, from the point of view of state revenue, to over-tax stimulants according to the Laffer curve concept. In Prof. Gwiazdowski’s opinion, low taxes on nicotine products could also actually reduce the proportion of people addicted to traditional cigarettes and tobacco.

– “But the question remains as to whether this will not encourage young people, those who have not yet tried cigarettes, to turn to some form of stimulant considered “cheap” and harmless”, Gwiazdowski noted.

Foto: .

According to the National Transformation Programme — the health programme for 2022–2027 — the focus should not so much be on treatment as such, but primarily on prevention.

This also applies to the fight against modern-age diseases, such as obesity and related metabolic diseases or alcohol and tobacco addiction. What policies, what programmes should health care policy take into account to improve the infamous rise in the incidence of modern-age diseases — these were the topics discussed by experts during the panel discussion, “State versus pragmatic health economics”.

Pozostało 91% artykułu
Gospodarka
Rosjanie rezygnują z obchodów Nowego Roku. Pieniądze pójdą na front
Gospodarka
Indeks wiarygodności ekonomicznej Polski. Jest źle, ale inni mają gorzej
Gospodarka
Margrethe Vestager, wiceprzewodnicząca KE: UE nie potrzebuje nowej polityki konkurencji
Gospodarka
Gospodarka Rosji jedzie na oparach. To oficjalne stanowisko Banku Rosji
Materiał Promocyjny
Klimat a portfele: Czy koszty transformacji zniechęcą Europejczyków?
Gospodarka
Tusk podjął decyzję. Prezes GUS odwołany ze stanowiska